Conventional wisdom says the candidate with the most votes is elected President. American politics disagrees. It is indirect elections via the Electoral College.
Neither part of a university system nor the equivalent of a British high school, the Electoral College is a group of selected delegates that ultimately pick the President of the USA. Never meeting as a national body, the electors chosen by each state elect the president. According to the Federal Election Commissionof the USA, in the 2000 presidential election, Vice President Al Gore won the majority of votes casts by the American citizens: Gore = 50,999,897 (48.38%); Bush = 50,456,002 (47.87%). However, the Supreme Court decision aside, the final electoral vote count was Bush 271; Gore 266. 537 electoral votes counted more than 101 million citizen votes (one person one vote.)
The college was modified by the twelfth amendment and is part of the compromise made at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. This process gives the states power in how to select the electors and subsequently the President of the USA. Small states become increasingly important because their citizen votes per electoral vote ratio are low.
Delegates: The American experiment was designed for ordinary citizens in each state to have a say in who the president would be, but the final decision would be made by people who were considered “most capable” about the candidates and the issues as stated by Hamilton in Federalist Paper #68. These capable men would be chosen by the states in a process that was chosen by the individual state. Similar to the process of selecting a party delegate, electoral delegates are loyal party individuals.
Selection Process: When the citizen voter votes for a presidential candidate, they are (in most cases) voting for a slate of party delegates representing that party in the Electoral College. State political parties chose their “slate” of electors and when a candidate wins the popular vote, those delegates become the state's electoral delegates.
During the Constitutional Convention, there were no political parties and the delegates were respected members of the state. There must be “…respect for the natural aristae,” as Jefferson said in his letters to Madison on Rights. In some states, state legislatures selected the electors but as Hamilton believed: “Nothing was more to be desired than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption.” Today elector members are chosen for their loyalty to the party and some of Jefferson's fears have arisen.
Electoral Winner: All but Maine and Nebraska have a “winner takes all” policy of dividing electoral votes. The winner of the popular vote in a state captures all that state’s electoral votes. In this fashion it is easy to see that the proportional citizen votes per electoral vote ratio of a state is extremely important. It is this process that allows a presidential candidate (as in Gore v. Bush) to win the national popular vote, yet loose the election because of fewer electoral votes.
Electoral Vote: When the voters of a state vote for a candidate on “election day,” they are in most cases electing a slate of party electors. These individuals will represent their political candidate in the Electoral College. It is a common misperception that citizens can choose a candidate of one party and an electorate of the rival party will become a presidential electorate for that state.
Flaws most definitely exist; however, this is not one. The electoral vote will closely represent, at least the political party of the presidential candidate. While true the electorate can vote for the rival candidate, it is unlikely that he would do so (Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 214.)
The copyright of the article What Is the Electoral College? in US President is owned by Frank W. Hardy. Permission to republish What Is the Electoral College? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
ALL THIS DELEGATE BUSINESS, AND ELECTORAL BUSINESS SHOULD BY NOW BE
OBSOLETE. HOW DARE ANYONE TELL WE THE PEOPLE, WE ARE NOT CAPABLE OF VOTING
OUR SELECTION INTO OFFICE. WE THE PEOPLE MEANS, THE MAJORITY RULES. OUR
VOTES SHOULD BE THE ONLY THING THAT COUNTS. IF WHOM WE PUT INTO OFFICE
DECIDES OUR FATE, THAN WE THE PEOPLE SHOULD BE MAKING THE SELECTION. WHEN
WILL SOMETHING BE DONE ABOUT THIS, ONCE AND FOR ALL. PEOPLE ARE BEGINNING
TO GET ANGRY. I KNOW, I NOW UNDERSTAND THAT MY VOTE COUNTS FOR NOTHING. I
THOUGHT OUR COUNTRY IS FOR THE PEOPLE. OF THE PEOPLE , ETC..........FIX IT.
IT'S A BROKEN SYSTEM. FIX IT!!
Sep 29, 2008 4:29 PM
Guest :
Boy was Stahlin right when he said something to the effect: it's not who
casts the vote that counts, rather the one who counts the votes that
matters.
Oct 9, 2008 8:35 AM
Guest :
But, there are so many people who vote and don't even research issues or
get involved and are easily persuaded. A majority of citizens lack
knowledge and common sense. I don't know if I want the majority of people
who are not educated and at the mercy of the media making the final
decision on what is best for our country. They usually want what is best
for themselves.
Oct 16, 2008 3:53 PM
Guest :
For years I have been wondering when the house and senate would amend this
part of the constitution. It is clear that in a time when the average
person in the US has 3 TV's, and 2 computers and 70% of them have access to
the internet. That most Americans are NOT capable of understanding how
politics work in the US. They are too busy watching re runs of MASH or new
episodes of Fringe to really understand the political machine. I think it
is a very good safety net to have in place the reason being that in most
elections for President only about 25% of the population ends up Actually
voting. And of these individuals only about 2% have any idea why they are
voting or why they picked the candidate they voted for. The average person
according to the Wilson school of politics will make their decision by
looking at a picture of their candidate for only 1/10th of one Sec. Hmmm go
figure. I would imagine the reason that the divorce rate is so high is
because people are choosing their spouses the same way. By emotions and
looking at a picture online. I am a conservative and think that I do Not
want to have my President elected by a bunch of liberals that are
emotionally charged. The way to win this election and stay away from
Socialism is to NOT elect a Marxist like Barrack Hussein O'bama. Get your
friends and family's together and get to the ballot box. Hopefully we can
hold on the the America I know and defended in the Navy for 8 years. God
bless America and god damn.. anyone that votes for Socialism and Obama.